September 9, 2010

A Pint of Bitter: Cameron’s gaffes, Boris’s bikes and one big pub garden

We’re in the “silly season” in Britain now, the period when Parliament is in recess and little happens politically until the party conferences in September. But nowadays, politics happens even in August – though the Prime Minister probably wishes it didn’t. First, in America last month, he said Britain had been the “junior partner” to the US in 1940, which didn’t so much wound anyone’s national pride as reveal a dodgy grasp of history – most British people are happy to accept we were the junior partner in war from the end of 1941. His outspoken remarks about Pakistan, during his visit to India, were surely no mistake but agreed with the US beforehand so as to send a signal to Pakistan’s government. Cameron’s batting technique was more suspect, though he still hit a 51-year-old Kapil Dev through mid-wicket. The fact that he used a tennis ball may have helped. But since coming back to this country, the PM has had a series of media appearances and public meetings – and has got into a bit of trouble.

The Prime Minister's Office | CreativeCommons

Most recently he said Iran already has a nuclear weapon, which is either a silly mistake, or else a silly leaking of white-hot intelligence. Before that, he suggested in response to a member of the public that social housing should not be “for life”.    Obviously people can buy houses or flats in the UK, or else rent in the private sector. But it’s also possible to apply to be housed by local government – or more usually these days, to be housed on behalf of your local council by a “housing association” – and to pay rent to them indefinitely. Cameron’s idea is a radical one: it would not just end the arguably socialist idea that social housing is an alternative and permanent lifestyle choice, but also Margaret Thatcher’s conception of a council house as “your home” – something you should be entitled to buy from the government and then own. The immediate problem was, though, that the idea hadn’t been agreed by the coalition, as was immediately pointed out in no uncertain terms by the Liberal Democrat deputy leader, Simon Hughes.

Simon Hughes | Liberal Democrats | CreativeCommons

Hughes is an interesting figure. Clearly on the left of his party, he’s long wanted to lead it, but never succeeded. He was elected to his post, but in truth practically handed it on a plate in a shrewd move by the real leader, Nick Clegg. Shrewd, because having Hughes as a sort of leader of the Liberal Democrats outside the coalition reassures members that the party’s identity has not been abandoned; shrewd because it means a powerful figure is able, as in this instance on social housing, to exert pressure on David Cameron from outside government, and publicly, as Clegg himself does privately on the inside; and shrewd because it means Hughes cannot actually plot to bring him down except by openly splitting the party. It gives Hughes a powerful role, but making it an official party one ties him into exercising it responsibly.

Apart from that, the Conservative right-winger’s right-winger, the disastrous former leader Iain Duncan Smith, set out some ideas for reforming welfare – a big part of public spending, on which the coalition really must make big savings. Duncan Smith has been devoting himself to social exclusion and poverty since he was ousted as leader in 2005 and has made a decent reputation as a radical and a reformer. But his brief is a tough one to deliver. In truth, making work pay in the way he wants to – by allowing those who find jobs to keep more of their welfare benefits for a transitional period – is likely to cost money rather than saving it. The most radical and immediately implementable idea that would unite two big Conservative themes – the “big society” of active citizens and welfare reform – would be to make receipt of unemployment benefits conditional on providing full-time public service, for instance as a charity volunteer. It’s so obvious that I think the government must already have decided not to dare.

Michael Keen | CreativeCommons

In London, the mayor Boris Johnson finally has a concrete, visible achievement: “Boris’s bikes”. At various places in central London you can now find a rack of sturdy bikes, any of which you can use for half an hour, free, or else pay to ride for longer. This is an idea that deserves to be popular, and which is stolen from Paris. It was even apparently first conceived by the previous mayor in fact, so isn’t Boris’s idea at all. But it’s a good one, and I can’t wait to have my first ride. A pity we don’t have proper bicycle lanes in London to spare the risk of life and limb.

The Merlin's Cave

I’ve spent most of the summer in London, but last weekend involved a brief respite from the big city: Francesca and I spent an afternoon in Chalfont St. Giles, a village in Buckinghamshire that can fairly be called “just outside” the modern megopolis. Unfortunately we found Milton’s cottage closed. But the Norman Parish Church of St. Giles is really worth a visit, with a quite magnificent turnstyle of a lychgate, plus a 15th century mural and 15th century pews. Of course we ended our outing with a pint, at the Merlin’s Cave. Not a marvellous pub, this, at least on the inside – it’s too focused on TV screens and the pool table. But the beer and scrumpy are fine, and its real glory is the huge beer garden stretching down behind the church towards the river and a fine weeping willow. The couple of hours we spent there reading and talking were some of the best of the summer – and it’s places and times like that that make you want to live in England. Big society? Let’s make England one big pub garden instead.

Dispatches from the North: My Appearance on BBC Question Time

I came, I saw, I had my say.

I realize this is a long post, so I’ve split it into two parts for your benefit, first about the experience in general, and then specifically about my brief appearance.

Behind the scenes of BBC Question Time

The entire experience was amazing from start to finish and something I’ll never forget and always feel privileged I had the opportunity to participate in.

Let me start from the beginning, before the show every audience member must submit one question that is “provocative, and reflecting the main news of the week” which last week was difficult as a lot of the news was pretty intense foreign policy news. People love to talk about education, the economy and other close to home issues, but I think a lot of the week’s news was pretty intimidating and many were afraid to ask questions about the war in Afghanistan and David Cameron’s visit to the White House which dominated the headlines.

When we arrived we checked in and were given another card on which to write a second question relating to the day’s news. As the audience members enjoyed complimentary beverages and snacks in the pub, David Dimbleby walked in, grabbed a chair and stood on it to address the audience. He started out by commenting on the history of the Hartlepool Borough Hall which most of us didn’t realize used to be a police station, jail and magistrates court. I was really impressed that he took such an interest in the place and wasn’t “just passing through” and in his little pep talk he was exactly the same witty personality you see on TV.

He encouraged us to get involved, debate, argue with the panelists and each other and if we had something to say please say it. He also told us to treat it as a pantomime and if someone said something we liked to cheer and clap and if someone said something we disagreed with, by all means boo. I was left feeling positive about the whole experience I was about to be a part of.

I had a few expectations going in, first being that certainly it wasn’t a free for all and that the BBC carefully selected the questions and the people from the audience who got a chance to speak and challenge the panelists. This was not the case at all, the only thing the producers had control of was selecting which audience members got to ask their questions to set the topics. This wasn’t done to control the content, questions were selected to make sure this show was current and didn’t cover things that had been covered in previous shows. It honestly was no holds barred and they spent quite a bit of time with the audience getting us warmed up and ready for a lively debate. It is exactly as it appears on TV with no gimmicks and no restrictions.

I also had expected that since we were to be there for 3 1/3 hours that we would spend a couple hours recording the show and debating and they would cut the show up and choose which comments to air. This wasn’t the case at all, the entire broadcasted show is recorded in real time and nothing is cut or excluded from the show.

At 7:15 we were led into the main hall where I saw the set, which looked so different without all the studio lights turned on. After we sat down the Floor Manager came out and requested that 5 audience members volunteer to come down and sit in the panelists’ seats. At this point, everyone was reluctant to get involved and it took some time for 5 people to volunteer themselves to come sit in the hot seats. Then the lights came on, the set came to life with stand-in panelists and the Floor Manager sat in David Dimbleby’s seat to act as the chairman. At this point he brought out a question from the previous week that hadn’t made the show so we would have something to debate with each other. The question was about child obesity in the UK and if child protection orders should be served on parents who allow their children to become obese. The audience spent the next hour debating this single question, with audience members standing in as panelists and this method worked like a charm because it really got the audience warmed up and the group who had been sitting silently and afraid to speak were suddenly getting into a lively debate with each other, all off camera. Then it was announced which audience members would get the opportunity to ask their questions and by the time the panelists were brought in, the audience was fired up and ready to go.

The panelists were brought in one by one, and the audience actually booed every single one of them. I think people were just excited that they had been encouraged to boo politicians and took the opportunity to boo them all whether they agreed with them or not. After the politicians were seated and their microphones pinned on (and Bob Crow’s bald head liberally dusted with powder by the makeup girl) we started with a test question which wasn’t recorded and gave the camera crews a chance to practice getting the angles they needed. After we discussed the practice question we were told we were about to record and then it all started.

It was exciting sitting in the audience and there were some very entertaining arguments between Conservative MP Damian Green and Labour MP Sadiq Khan. Bob Crow seemed to go on tangents about things that seemed to have nothing at all to do with the questions (like Mill Wall football?), Ruth Lea found a way to make her responses as boring as possible and don’t even get me started on the ridiculous behavior of Nigel Farage.

This is Where it gets Interesting…

The show was winding down, I’d managed to go through nearly the whole show without needing to throw my hat in- and then Nigel Farage opened his mouth with some of the most inaccurate and patronising generalizations about the American people I have ever heard. Here is a clip which starts with his ignorant comments and then finally I was called on to speak and give him quite a shock.

Click here to view a larger version.

I honestly think Nigel Farage thought he could get away with what he said relying on the assumption that no Americans would see it, and if they did, certainly none of them would be there in the audience to challenge him. His mistake was to underestimate not only me, but Hartlepool as well. Throughout the night he continually spoke to the audience in a patronising tone, attempting to flatter us and drop in comments like “walking down the high street in Hartlepool” (Hartlepool doesn’t actually have a proper high street) and other such instruments politicians are accustomed to using to woo voters and supporters. He tried to “come down to our level” and figured he could tell us anything and we would buy it, but his comments about America didn’t go unnoticed by the audience. I was also further offended that as I was speaking and challenging him on his ignorant comments he attempted to talk over me, and David Dimbleby actually had to tell him to be quiet and let me have my say. Nigel underestimated the people of Hartlepool, and he certainly didn’t plan on me.

I’ve had the very surreal experience of being able to read about myself on Twitter. I’m quite happy to report that about 99% of Tweeters seemed to be cheering me on, but there was a handful of people who decided to focus on me “forgetting” about Wales (trust me, I didn’t forget I had only a few seconds to get my point across and couldn’t find all the words in the very high pressure heat of the moment), one Tweeter thought I was planted in the audience by the BBC, and then there were a few others who missed the point completely and drew conclusions that I was taking an opposing position to Nigel Farage on the issue.

This was not my aim, I was poking holes in Nigel Farage’s (very weak) argument and what I didn’t actually do was assert any opinion of my own on the topic. I wasn’t going to allow him to fabricate justifications for his point of view while insulting me and all Americans as a means to support his argument. If he thought that nobody representing the UK or Scottish government should be sent to answer for the release of al-Megrahi, I have no problem with that, but to base that argument on a belief that Americans would be confused by devolution of the UK government (a system uncannily similar to state governance in the US) and that we don’t care about anything going on outside our borders is a totally ludicrous way to support such an argument.

I think some people assumed that because I was disagreeing with the premise of Nigel’s argument that they could draw a conclusion that I think Kenny MacAskill and Alex Salmond should be sent to the White House when I didn’t say that at all. I can honestly understand and relate to both sides of the issue, but thats not even what the question was. The question that was asked was whether Alex Salmond should be the one speaking to Obama instead of David Cameron. I do think if anyone at all is going to go it should be whoever was responsible for making the decision and it makes no sense for David Cameron or any member of the current Coalition government to be answering for decisions they had nothing to do with. This would be akin to Barack Obama being asked to answer for a decision that Arnold Schwarzenegger made in California 3 years ago.

As for the comments that Bob Crow made after I spoke, I didn’t really take them as directed at me at all. That was his one chance to speak on the issue and it was clearly a rehearsed answer (and a bit of a red herring if I’m being completely honest). All of the panelists would have known this might be one of the questions and he would have said that in response to any question on the topic regardless of whether I had been there or not.

Overall it was an unforgettable experience, and I like to think I used my 15 seconds of “fame” to defend my fellow Americans, and the cherry on the top was the priceless look on Nigel Farage’s face.

Anglotopia’s Columnist Lisa Coulson Appears on BBC Question Time

Exciting news – one of our columnists – Lisa Coulson who writes Dispatches from the North has appeared on the Telly!

That’s right, Lisa had her say on BBC’s Question Time – a current events news show where real people get to cross examine politicians and other newsmakers. It’s usually riveting television as politicians have to actually face the people they claim to represent.

Lisa has her say when Nigel Farage insults all of America by stating that we couldn’t possibly understand that Scotland has it’s own government sepearate from the rest of the UK in relation to the Libyan terrorist set free by Britain last year on ‘compassionate grounds.’

Good job Lisa! See below for the video of Lisa on Question Time.

Click here to view a larger version.

A Pint of Bitter: Football failure, fiscal austerity and the third man

England crashed out of the World Cup. Of course. Their defeat, conceding four goals to Germany, was abject and depressing even by their own sorry standards, and led to an angry, vindictive inquest from supporters, giving edge to the despond that usually follows England’s exit. How is that stars like Rooney and Lampard can go to a tournament like that and simply not perform? How can the manager have stuck rigidly to an outdated tactical system? Why play Gerrard wide on the left? I epxected Fabio Capello to lose his job as England coach but someone, somewhere thinks he has learned enough from this experience to do better in future, that perhaps failure was not his fault. Or he may have been too expensive to sack. At any rate, England carry on as the football world’s most underachieving nation now that relentless Spain, tiring defences like matadors before sticking in one fatal goal in a way that’s impressive, like Rafael Nadal, rather than exciting, have managed to win the big one.

Tim Ellis | CreativeCommons

So it’s back to normal life, and the dreary reality of the coalition’s austerity Britain. Actually I suspect my countrymen and women of secretly salivating at the thought of cut-backs, somewhere in the recesses of our imaginations. Pride in past victory has lent a certain glamour to the grimness of rationing and make-do-and-mend, and I sense relish in some quarters at the thought that the coming years may make rigour pay, and our pleasures rarer and simpler. I share the feeling myself, to some extent. Compared to the old days, when wine was an unheard of luxury to most British people and clothes and books were made from special materials, we don’t even know what austerity means. We live lives of excess, for the most part, private debt is at levels that would have made 1950s housewives faint, and giving a few things up would do us good.

Preapring for Oxfam's "Make do and Mend" fashion event | Ruth Geach | CreativeCommons

It doesn’t necessarily follow, though, that the country needs the extremest fiscal rigour possible. Most people I sense accept the government’s view that early, decisive action in needed to reduce Britain’s deficit as quickly as possible. It’s an argument that seems to have been won since the election rather than before it; no doubt the trouble in Greece has helped convince people we don’t want to go there. Perhaps what’s happening shows that the change of government was the best thing for the country because, while many people I think accept Labour’s Keynesian stimulus spending helped the country through the recession (unemployment is lower and fewer people have lost their homes than we might have feared), they’d have found it hard to accept that same government cutting back. The incoming government can do so with much more good will – for the moment at least. Their project is a difficult one, though, and if private sector growth does not pick up it may turn impossible. They have to hope it does – and that their own cuts don’t suppress it.

One of the things the coalition has resorted to in its economy drive is to ask us how they can save money. I think this is a good idea – I’ve even sent in my own suggestions. It may be true that this is more about public morale, but I do think government should consult people individually (rather than simply engage with lobby groups) and that the internet is, realistically, the only way of doing that. Inevitably this sort of exercise is bound to attract the mad, the nasty and the comical. My own favourite was the suggestion that we should sell the England football team, an idea that, together with every other idea, appears unfortunately to have been taken down from the site now. The main objection commenters made was that it wouldn’t raise much money.

Downing Street | CreativeCommons

One way a citizen can make money out of government is to publish political memoirs, as Peter, Lord Mandelson, has done within days, practically, of losing his job as effective deputy to the Prime Minister. The memoirs are being serialised in the Times – which means I can’t link you to an extract, the Times now hiding behind a “pay wall”. A pity. Mandelson’s alienated his few friends in the Labour party with this apparently warts-and-all account of the poisonous relations between Tony Blair and Gordon Brown: he quotes Blair as calling Brown “mad, bad, dangerous and beyond redemption”, which is not high praise for his successor. I’m glad Mandelson has published, though. The book will reveal little the public wasn’t aware of in at least a vague sense: that Blair and Brown came to hate each other after 1994 has been obvious. What it does do, though, is make it difficult for Labour politicians to deny it any longer. It may also suggest that Brown was more at fault than Blair. If I read it soon, I’ll let you know.

Jonathan and Jackie and the George

It’s not long since I wrote about the George, but I must mention my visit there last week – because it was to have a beer with Jonathan and Jackie, who were in London for a visit. On one of the most sweltering days of the summer we took refuge in the cool interior and downed plenty of salt and vinegar crisps as well as (in my case) a couple of pints of George Ale. I’m not sure exactly when I’ll see them again – but I don’t think it’ll be long!

Meryl Streep as the Iron Maiden?

The Huffington Post is reporting that Meryl Streep has expressed an interest in playing Margaret Thatcher in a biopic to be produced to Pathe films in London.

According to the Huffington Post:

Pathe Films says the two-time Academy Award winner has expressed an interest in playing Margaret Thatcher in a new film about Britain’s first female prime minister.

The London-based producer and distributor said Thursday that discussions are under way with Streep’s representatives, but no agreement is in place.

Written by Abi Morgan (“Sex Traffic,” “Brick Lane”) the film is provisionally titled “The Iron Lady.” Pathe says it “tells the story of a woman who smashed through the barriers of gender and class to be heard in a male-dominated world.”

The director is Phyllida Lloyd, who directed Streep in the Abba musical “Mamma Mia!”

Filming is due to start at the end of the year.

Sounds like a really interesting project. I think she would make a great Thatcher!

What do you think?